From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrett v. Woodle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 22, 2018
No. CV-17-08085-PCT-BSB (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV-17-08085-PCT-BSB

10-22-2018

Joyce Garrett, Plaintiff, v. Johnnye L Woodle, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade's Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss without prejudice Defendants ABC Partnerships I-X, XYZ Corporations I-X, John Does I-X, and Jane Does I-X pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Doc. 69.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When reviewing a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this Court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made," and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983)). Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge's recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's factual findings; the Court then may decide the dispositive motion on the applicable law. Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979) (citing Campbell v. United States Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974)).

By failing to object to a Report and Recommendation, a party waives its right to challenge the Magistrate's factual findings, but not necessarily the Magistrate's legal conclusions. Baxter, 923 F.2d at 1394; see also Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998) (failure to object to Magistrate's legal conclusion "is a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal"); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir. 1980)).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 69.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing without prejudice Defendants ABC Partnerships I-X, XYZ Corporations I-X, John Does I-X, and Jane Does I-X pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Dated this 22nd day of October, 2018.

/s/_________

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garrett v. Woodle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 22, 2018
No. CV-17-08085-PCT-BSB (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Garrett v. Woodle

Case Details

Full title:Joyce Garrett, Plaintiff, v. Johnnye L Woodle, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Oct 22, 2018

Citations

No. CV-17-08085-PCT-BSB (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2018)