From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrett v. Johnson-Trammell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 23, 2023
21-cv-03323-HSG (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-03323-HSG (TSH)

02-23-2023

GINA GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. KYLA JOHNSON-TRAMMELL, et al., Defendants.


DISCOVERY ORDER

RE: DKT. NOS. 118, 125

THOMAS S. HIXSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On February 13, 2023, Defendant Kyla Johnson-Trammell filed a discovery letter brief concerning Plaintiff Gina Garrett's responses to Defendant's first and second sets of requests for production, first and second sets of requests for admissions, and first and second sets of interrogatories. ECF No. 118. On February 16, 2023, Judge Gilliam ordered the parties to meet and confer. He ordered the parties to file a joint discovery letter brief “[i]f there are any outstanding discovery disputes after the meet and confer,” ECF No. 120. On February 22, 2023, Defendant filed a unilateral discovery letter brief, which states “[p]er the Court's order on February 16, 2023, this letter outlines those portions of Plaintiff's discovery responses which remain at issue.” ECF No. 125.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the letter brief at ECF No. 118 at moot. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's February 22 letter brief no later than February 27, 2023. The response shall not exceed four pages. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file a timely response will be treated as a default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garrett v. Johnson-Trammell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 23, 2023
21-cv-03323-HSG (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Garrett v. Johnson-Trammell

Case Details

Full title:GINA GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. KYLA JOHNSON-TRAMMELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 23, 2023

Citations

21-cv-03323-HSG (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2023)