From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garnsey v. Miller

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 24, 2007
9:04-CV-95 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 24, 2007)

Opinion

9:04-CV-95.

July 24, 2007

ANDRE GARNSEY, Petitioner, Pro Se, 00-A-0486, Eastern Correctional Facility, Napanoch, New York.

BRIDGET ERIN HOLOHAN, ESQ., Asst. Attorney General, HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Respondent Department of Law, Albany, New York.


DECISION and ORDER


Petitioner, Andrew Garnsey, brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on January 26, 2004; and filed an amended petition on April 29, 2004. By Report-Recommendation dated June 29, 2007, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the petition be denied. There have been no objections made to the Report-Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety.

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garnsey v. Miller

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 24, 2007
9:04-CV-95 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Garnsey v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW GARNSEY, Petitioner, v. DAVID MILLER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jul 24, 2007

Citations

9:04-CV-95 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 24, 2007)

Citing Cases

Fink v. Bennett

The denial of a claim under CPL § 440.10(2)(c) is an adequate and independent state procedural ground barring…