From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garnes v. Pritchard Indus.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 19, 2020
20-CV-3843 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 19, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-3843 (CM)

05-19-2020

MARK GARNES, Plaintiff, v. PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION :

Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee - or, to request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Plaintiff submitted an application, styled as a motion for an extension of time to file an employment discrimination action, which the Court has construed as a complaint for employment discrimination and opened as a new action under docket number 20-CV-3843 (CM). Plaintiff failed, however, to either pay the filing fees or submit an IFP application requesting waiver of fees. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-3843 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

In light of the current global health crisis, parties proceeding pro se are encouraged to submit all filings by email to Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov. Pro se parties also are encouraged to consent to receive all court documents electronically. A consent to electronic service form is available on the Court's website. Pro se parties who are unable to use email may submit documents by regular mail or in person at the drop box located at the U.S. Courthouses in Manhattan (500 Pearl Street) and White Plains (300 Quarropas Street). For more information, including instructions on this new email service for pro se parties, please visit the Court's website at nysd.uscourts.gov.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garnes v. Pritchard Indus.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 19, 2020
20-CV-3843 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Garnes v. Pritchard Indus.

Case Details

Full title:MARK GARNES, Plaintiff, v. PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 19, 2020

Citations

20-CV-3843 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 19, 2020)

Citing Cases

Garnes v. Pritchard Indus.

This is the second of four actions Mr. Garnes has filed in this Court in connection with his employment with…

Garnes v. Pritchard Indus.

Although not addressed in this Order, Mr. Garnes has also filed two other actions in this Court against…