From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garner v. Reynolds

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec 10, 2013
415 S.W.3d 763 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 99899.

2013-12-10

Steve GARNER, Appellant, v. Rod REYNOLDS, d/b/a M & N Automotive, LLC and Rod Reynolds, Respondents.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Michael T. Jamison. Jerry L. Suddarth, O'Fallon, MO, for appellant. William E. Burris, Clayton, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Michael T. Jamison.
Jerry L. Suddarth, O'Fallon, MO, for appellant. William E. Burris, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Steve Garner appeals from the judgment entered against him on his claims for breach of contract against Rod Reynolds, individually, and Rod Reynolds doing business as M & N Automotive, LLC. Garner contends that the court erred when it set aside the default judgment that had been entered against the defendants as a result of discovery violations, dismissed his petition with prejudice and entered judgment against him after concluding that Garner failed to prove his entitlement to damages. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Garner v. Reynolds

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec 10, 2013
415 S.W.3d 763 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Garner v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:Steve GARNER, Appellant, v. Rod REYNOLDS, d/b/a M & N Automotive, LLC and…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

415 S.W.3d 763 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)