From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garmon v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 14, 2011
Case No. CV 10-6609-SJO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 10-6609-SJO (PJW)

12-14-2011

DETRICE GARMON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the claims against Defendants Michele Hanisee, Steve Cooley, and the County of Los Angeles be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that the claims against Defendant Kaiser Permanente be dismissed without prejudice.

____________

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garmon v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 14, 2011
Case No. CV 10-6609-SJO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Garmon v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:DETRICE GARMON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 10-6609-SJO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2011)