From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garland v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 16, 2013
Case 2:12-cv-0147-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Case 2:12-cv-0147-GMN-VCF

12-16-2013

RICHARD GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE CAM FERENBACH

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 36) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered November 25, 2013, regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 31) filed on April 5, 2013.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 36) were due by December 12, 2013. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Recommendations should be ACCEPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend to add a Fourteenth Amended Due Process claim is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Officers Crosby and Pates are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

_______________

Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garland v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 16, 2013
Case 2:12-cv-0147-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Garland v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 16, 2013

Citations

Case 2:12-cv-0147-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2013)