From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garland v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 13, 1914
143 P. 661 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 5450

Opinion Filed October 13, 1914.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Summons. A petition in error will be dismissed on motion, even though the same is filed within the statutory period, where no waiver of issuance and service of summons is had, and no praecipe for same filed, and no summons is issued or general appearance made within such time.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Haskell County; W. H. Brown, Judge.

Action between Garrett Garland and Mage Henderson and another. From the judgment, Garland brings error. Dismissed.

Fred H. Fannin, for plaintiff in error.

Guy A. Curry, for defendants in error.


The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered on February 14, 1913, and the motion for new trial was overruled February 25, 1913. The petition in error was filed in this court on August 8, 1913. The statutory period for perfecting an appeal (chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11) has long since expired, and as no praecipe for summons in error has been filed, no summons in error issued, nor any waiver of issuance of summons or entry of general appearance by defendants in error been made, this proceeding in error must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Anderson v. McMahon et al., 33 Okla. 377, 125 P. 455, and cases cited.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Garland v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 13, 1914
143 P. 661 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

Garland v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:GARLAND v. HENDERSON et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 13, 1914

Citations

143 P. 661 (Okla. 1914)
143 P. 661

Citing Cases

Vaden v. Purcell Compress Co.

"Where summons in error is not issued and served within the time allowed by statute, and no pr æcipe therefor…