From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gargiulio v. S. Katzman Produce Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
19-cv-11726 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

19-cv-11726 (PKC)

07-07-2021

Vincent Gargiulio, Plaintiffs, v. S. Katzman Produce, Inc., et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

P. Kevin Castel United States District Judge

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within forty-five days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same forty-five day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gargiulio v. S. Katzman Produce Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
19-cv-11726 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Gargiulio v. S. Katzman Produce Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Vincent Gargiulio, Plaintiffs, v. S. Katzman Produce, Inc., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Citations

19-cv-11726 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)