From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Villa Monte Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 1, 1985
328 S.E.2d 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

69515.

DECIDED MARCH 1, 1985. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 15, 1985.

Action for costs. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge McKenzie.

W. Pitts Carr, David H. Pope, for appellants.

Sidney F. Wheeler, William A. Dinges, Lenwood A. Jackson, J. Loren Fowler, for appellees.


Appellants sued appellees and the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta for damages arising from the drowning death of Mrs. Gardner's two daughters. On appeal from a judgment in appellants' favor, this court reversed with direction that a new trial be granted to the Housing Authority and that judgment n.o.v. be granted to the other two defendants, the appellees in the present appeal. Upon the return of the remittitur to the trial court, appellees moved for a judgment against appellants for the costs of the appeal. The motion, based on OCGA § 5-6-5 and on this court's decision in Marshall v. Fulton Nat. Bank, 152 Ga. App. 121 (1) ( 262 S.E.2d 448) (1979), revd. on other grounds, Fulton Nat. Bank v. Marshall, 245 Ga. 745 ( 267 S.E.2d 225) (1980), was granted, resulting in a judgment against appellants for $1,951.75. This appeal is from that judgment.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for noncompliance with OCGA § 5-6-35. That section provides a procedure for invoking the discretion of the appellate court to hear appeals in certain specified classes of cases, and reads in pertinent part as follows: "(a) Appeals in the following cases shall be taken as provided in this Code section: . . . (6) Appeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $2,500 or less . . . " Id. The appellants in the present appeal did not follow the procedure established by the quoted Code section.

In response to appellees' motion to dismiss, appellants argue that OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) does not apply to their appeal, because the judgment did not arise from an action for damages by appellees. The essence of that argument is that the section applies only when a plaintiff is successful in the trial court and the judgment granted to that plaintiff is for less than $2,500.

We do not find any language in the Code section which limits its application to judgments in favor of plaintiffs. As we read the statute, it applies to all judgments for $2,500 or less that arise from an action for damages. Since the suit filed by appellants was an action for damages and since this judgment was entered in that action, we find inescapable the conclusion that OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) is applicable. It necessarily follows that appellants' failure to invoke the discretion of this court by an application pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 requires that this appeal be dismissed. Hogan v. Taylor County Bd. of Education, 157 Ga. App. 680 ( 278 S.E.2d 106) (1981). Appeal dismissed. Banke, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 1, 1985 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 15, 1985 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Gardner v. Villa Monte Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 1, 1985
328 S.E.2d 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Gardner v. Villa Monte Homes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARDNER et al. v. VILLA MONTE HOMES, INC. et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 1, 1985

Citations

328 S.E.2d 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
328 S.E.2d 565

Citing Cases

Pathfinder Payment Solutions, Inc. v. Global Payments Direct, Inc.

See Vaughn v. Cable East Point, Inc. , 185 Ga. App. 203, 203, 363 S.E.2d 639 (1987) ; see also Anderson v.…

Vaughn v. Cable East Point, Inc.

"As we read the statute, it applies to all judgments for $2,500 or less that arise from an action for…