From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 12, 1926
106 So. 894 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

3 Div. 511.

January 12, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lowndes County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.

James Gardner was convicted of possessing a still, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

R. L. Goldsmith, of Hayneville, for appellant.

Counsel argues for error in refusal of the affirmative charge, but without citing authorities.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The sheriff found a still located in a ditch or gully, surrounded by some scrub oaks, and about 300 yards from defendant's house. The landlord, being examined by the state, testified that defendant was not in possession of the land where the still was found. No connection between the still and defendant is shown. The defendant is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. The state in this case has not met the burden of proof. The defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge, and for the error in refusing this charge the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Gardner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 12, 1926
106 So. 894 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Gardner v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARDNER v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jan 12, 1926

Citations

106 So. 894 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 208

Citing Cases

Milam v. State

C. W. McKay, of Ashland, for appellant. The evidence was insufficient to show possession of the still by…

Hendrick v. State

Huey Welch, of Bessemer, for appellant. Where the evidence in a criminal case is entirely circumstantial and…