From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. McCarthy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 1, 2013
2:12-cv-01613 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2013)

Opinion


DENNIS GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. J. McCARTHY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-01613 DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 1, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, currently an inmate at the Solano County detention facility, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 1, 2013, the court filed an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint and granting him leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF #6.) The court's order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable and only recently plaintiff has filed a notice of change of address with the court. Under these circumstances, the court will now order plaintiff to file his amended complaint within thirty days.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file his amended complaint as set forth in the court's April 1, 2013 order;

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of the court's April 1, 2013 order and a copy of the court's form complaint for a § 1983 action; and

         3. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Gardner v. McCarthy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 1, 2013
2:12-cv-01613 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Gardner v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. J. McCARTHY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 1, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-01613 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2013)