From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Coe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Dec 2, 2019
8:19CV521 (D. Neb. Dec. 2, 2019)

Opinion

8:19CV521

12-02-2019

BRYANT A. GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES R. COE, Nebraska Workers Compensation Administrative Law Judge, Official capacity; TIMOTHY E. CLARKE, Attorney, Baylor, Evnen. LLC, Individual capacity; RICHARD RENSCH LAW, Attorney/Trustee, Individual capacity; and PATRICK E. MCNAMARA, attorney, Individual capacity; Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Gregory B. Adams, Sr., a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Filing No. 2.) Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the court finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 2nd day of December, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gardner v. Coe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Dec 2, 2019
8:19CV521 (D. Neb. Dec. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Gardner v. Coe

Case Details

Full title:BRYANT A. GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES R. COE, Nebraska Workers…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Dec 2, 2019

Citations

8:19CV521 (D. Neb. Dec. 2, 2019)