Opinion
No. 17436 Index No. 22995/14 Case No. 2022-01144
03-02-2023
Misha Gardiner, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of New York, Defendant, Mr. Transportation, Inc. Doing Business as Marquis Ambulette, et al., Defendants-Respondents. City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Mr. Transportation, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendant-Respondents.
Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C., New York (Anthony Makarov of counsel), for appellant. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York (Dean L. Pillarella of counsel), for respondents.
Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C., New York (Anthony Makarov of counsel), for appellant.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York (Dean L. Pillarella of counsel), for respondents.
Before: Renwick, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Singh, Higgitt, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered February 15, 2022, which, in this action for personal injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly denied plaintiff's motion because the record presents triable issues of fact as to whether, inter alia, plaintiff should have seen defendants' vehicle as she was approaching the intersection (see Luciano-Mahoney v Rossman, 191 A.D.3d 604, 605 [1st Dept 2021]; Nevarez v S.R.M. Mgt. Corp., 58 A.D.3d 295, 298 [1st Dept 2008]).
We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: