From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Verbeek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 20, 2018
No. 2:14-cv-2266 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-2266 JAM AC P

04-20-2018

PAUL GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. T. VERBEEK, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed September 21, 2017, this court directed plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the forms necessary to effect service of process on defendant Verbeek. See ECF No. 24. The court stated that "[f]ailure of plaintiff to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice." Id. at 6.

The thirty-day period has long since expired and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order or otherwise communicated with the court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 20, 2018

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Garcia v. Verbeek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 20, 2018
No. 2:14-cv-2266 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Garcia v. Verbeek

Case Details

Full title:PAUL GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. T. VERBEEK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 20, 2018

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-2266 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2018)