From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2
Jul 16, 1980
601 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 61902.

July 16, 1980.

Appeal from the 24th Judicial District Court, Victoria County, Clarence N. Stevenson, J.

Ronald B. Walker, on appeal only, Victoria, for appellant.

Knute L. Dietze, Dist. Atty., Victoria, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before DOUGLAS, ODOM and DALLY, JJ.


OPINION OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF THE APPEAL


This appeal was abated for a post-trial jury finding on the issue of the appellant's competency to stand trial at the time of his hearing to revoke probation on September 21, 1978. The record has been supplemented to show that a jury has now determined that the appellant was competent to stand trial at his hearing to revoke probation on September 21, 1978. Stipulated evidence was presented to the jury which supports the jury's finding. The stipulated evidence included the report of a psychiatrist who had examined the appellant prior to the revocation proceeding. The report of the psychiatrist advised the trial judge that the appellant was competent to stand trial at the time in question.

The appeal is reinstated and the judgment is affirmed, Tex.Cr.App., 595 S.W.2d 538.


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2
Jul 16, 1980
601 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joe Antonio GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2

Date published: Jul 16, 1980

Citations

601 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Valdes-Fuerte v. State

The standard of review is whether the trial court abused its discretion. Garcia v. State, 595 S.W.2d 538, 542…

Koehler v. State

We must review the trial court's action pursuant to Article 46.02 § 4(a) under an abuse of discretion…