From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 9, 2012
No. 10-10-00201-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-10-00201-CR

08-09-2012

ANTHONY MARK GARCIA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 220th District Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14271


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Anthony Mark Garcia pled guilty to forgery and received deferred adjudication community supervision for a period of three years. The State later moved to proceed to an adjudication of guilt, alleging sixteen violations of his conditions of community supervision. Garcia pled "not true" to all of the allegations. The trial court found allegations 1-4, 8-10, 12, and 16 true, adjudicated Garcia guilty, and sentenced him to fifteen months' confinement in state jail.

Garcia's appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although informed of his right to do so, Garcia did not file a pro se response to the Anders brief.

In an Anders case, we must, "after a full examination of all the proceedings, . . . decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment.

We grant appointed counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Garcia. Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Garcia a copy of our decision, notify him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter certifying counsel's compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Affirmed
Do not publish
[CR25]


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 9, 2012
No. 10-10-00201-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MARK GARCIA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

No. 10-10-00201-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)