From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1993
193 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that the failure of defendant's clerical service to advise it of the court's decision to grant its motion for summary judgment does not constitute good cause for its failure to settle an order within 60 days after the signing and filing of the decision, as required by 22 NYCRR 202.48 (see, Stanley v City of New York, 157 A.D.2d 466, lv dismissed 75 N.Y.2d 947; Feldman v New York City Tr. Auth., 171 A.D.2d 473). Perhaps such an excuse would be more compelling were the delay somewhat shorter than the 14 months that occurred here, a delay which, for all that appears, would have continued indefinitely had it not been for plaintiffs' initiative in seeking to deem defendant's motion abandoned.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Garcia v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1993
193 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Garcia v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:PURA GARCIA et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 6, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 77

Citing Cases

Russo v. City of New York

The court, however, ruled, inter alia, that there was no point in reviving a lawsuit devoid of merit. While…

Glendora v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Therefore, the petition was properly dismissed as against him (see, Gaynor v. Rockefeller, 21 A.D.2d 92, 94,…