Opinion
8:23-cv-01952-CJC-KES
01-22-2024
Jesus Garcia v. Lee, Ho & Ho Partnership et al
Rolls Royce Paschal
Rolls Royce Paschal
PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiffs are responsible for prosecuting their actions diligently and complying with Court orders. The Court's Order Regarding Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act states that “[p]roofs of service for all defendants must be filed within 95 days of the filing of the case absent a previously approved extension of time by the Court or a motion or responsive pleading by all defendants.” (Dkt. 9 [hereinafter the “Order”] at 2 [emphases in original].) The Order further admonishes that “failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a dismissal for lack of prosecution.” (Id. at 3.)
Plaintiff filed this case on October 17, 2023. Although more than 95 days have passed since that date, Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service on any defendant. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action for lack of prosecution.