From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 8, 2022
Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA

03-08-2022

JEREMY GARCIA and CG, Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDER JONES; SHELBY FOLDEN; LINN COUNTY COURT HOUSE; LINN COUNTY SHERIFF; ALBANY POLICE DEPARTMENT; and OREGON STATE CREDIT UNION, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE:

Plaintiff has indicated to court staff that he intends to file physical objects as exhibits in support of an amended complaint, including laptop computers and credit cards. Plaintiff is to refrain from doing so and court staff shall not accept custody of any such items from Plaintiff. If Plaintiff wishes to submit exhibits in support of his amended complaint, they must be in the form of papers, digital photographs, or other easily digitized media.

CONCLUSION

The Court will not accept submission or custody of physical objects from Plaintiff at this time. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this directive may result in entry of a judgment of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 8, 2022
Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY GARCIA and CG, Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDER JONES; SHELBY FOLDEN; LINN…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2022)