From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia-Marquez v. Fed. Express Corp.

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Feb 17, 2022
21-CV-116 KRS/JFR (D.N.M. Feb. 17, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-116 KRS/JFR

02-17-2022

PEGGY GARCIA-MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION And RENAISSANCE INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, LLC, Defendants.

HARTLINE BARGER LLP Ryan T. Goodhue Michael G. Smith Attorneys for Defendant Federal Express Corporation PARNALL LAW FIRM, LLC Una Campbell Attorneys for Plaintiff DIXON, SCHOLL, CARRILLO, P.A. James C. Wilkey Gerald G. Dixon Attorneys for Defendant Renaissance Industrial Partners, LLC


HARTLINE BARGER LLP Ryan T. Goodhue Michael G. Smith Attorneys for Defendant Federal Express Corporation

PARNALL LAW FIRM, LLC Una Campbell Attorneys for Plaintiff

DIXON, SCHOLL, CARRILLO, P.A. James C. Wilkey Gerald G. Dixon Attorneys for Defendant Renaissance Industrial Partners, LLC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THE HONORABLE KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion to Dismiss, finds that motion to be well taken, and therefore orders that Plaintiff Peggy Garcia-Marquez's Third Amended Complaint for Damages is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims that have been or could have been brought in this matter or resulting from this matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees.


Summaries of

Garcia-Marquez v. Fed. Express Corp.

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Feb 17, 2022
21-CV-116 KRS/JFR (D.N.M. Feb. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia-Marquez v. Fed. Express Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PEGGY GARCIA-MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION And…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Feb 17, 2022

Citations

21-CV-116 KRS/JFR (D.N.M. Feb. 17, 2022)