From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garces v. Sentinel Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2021
Case No. 5:21-cv-00189-JWH-SPx (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5:21-cv-00189-JWH-SPx

05-18-2021

ALVIN JOSEPH GARCES, Plaintiff, v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD, dba THE HARTFORD; and DOES 1 TO 100, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order filed concurrently herewith, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered as follows:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the above-captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

2. Judgment in this action is entered in FAVOR of Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and AGAINST Plaintiff Alvin Joseph Garces.

3. Fictitiously named Defendants Does 1 to 100 are DISMISSED.

4. Plaintiff Alvin Joseph Garces shall recover nothing on his Complaint, and this action is DISMISSED on the merits.

5. To the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2021

/s/_________

John W. Holcomb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garces v. Sentinel Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2021
Case No. 5:21-cv-00189-JWH-SPx (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Garces v. Sentinel Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN JOSEPH GARCES, Plaintiff, v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD, dba…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 18, 2021

Citations

Case No. 5:21-cv-00189-JWH-SPx (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2021)

Citing Cases

Protege Rest. Partners v. Sentinel Ins. Co.

Id. at 16. Many courts have come to the same conclusion about identical or similar exclusion provisions at…

One40 Beauty Lounge, LLC v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd.

(finding identical Virus Exclusion unambiguous and rejecting argument that canons of construction are…