From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garceau v. Woodford

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 3, 2005
399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 99-99022.

Argued and Submitted March 24, 2004.

Filed March 3, 2005.

Lynne S. Coffin, Coffin Love, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

Clayton S. Tanaka, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for the respondent-appellee.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV F-95-5363 OWW.

Before O'SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The Supreme Court reversed our prior judgment and remanded this case for us to determine the effect of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 on this case. See Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 210, 123 S.Ct. 1398, 155 L.Ed.2d 363 (2003). After supplemental briefing after remand, oral argument, and submission of the case for decision, petitioner Robert Frederick Garceau died on December 29, 2004.

Because petitioner's death renders this case moot, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed as moot. See Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2003). This case is therefore remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

REMANDED with instructions.


Summaries of

Garceau v. Woodford

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 3, 2005
399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Garceau v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:Robert Frederick GARCEAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeanne S. WOODFORD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 2005

Citations

399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Zakouto v. Baca

See Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing petition for a writ of certiorari…

Wood v. Woodford

Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed as moot. See Garceau v. Woodford, 399…