From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gant v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 5, 2015
2:15-cv-0790-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2015)

Opinion


TONY AUSTIN GANT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-0790-MCE-CMK United States District Court, E.D. California. June 5, 2015

          ORDER

          CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, proceeding in propria persona, originally filed this civil action in the Superior Court of California, County of Shasta. Defendant removed this action from the state court on April 10, 2015. Pending before this court is defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 5). No opposition to the pending motion has been filed. Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the hearing scheduled for June 10, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matter submitted on the record and briefs without oral argument.

         In addition, the address plaintiff used on his original complaint appears to no longer be a current address for plaintiff, as mail sent to that address has been returned. Defendant indicates that mail sent to an alternate address, in the care of an individual presumed to be plaintiff's wife, has not been returned. Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff at his address of record as well as to the following address:

         Plaintiff is informed that pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), he is required to inform the court and all other parties of any address change. Absent a notice of change of address, service of documents at the prior address is fully effective.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gant v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 5, 2015
2:15-cv-0790-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Gant v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TONY AUSTIN GANT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 5, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-0790-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2015)