From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gant v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 21, 2020
No. CV 14-9333-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020)

Opinion

No. CV 14-9333-VAP (AGR)

01-21-2020

CLARENCE L. GANT, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 21, 2020

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gant v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 21, 2020
No. CV 14-9333-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Gant v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE L. GANT, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 21, 2020

Citations

No. CV 14-9333-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020)