From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamoneda v. New York City Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1999
259 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 18, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.).


Since defendants were in receipt of an accident report and an aided report, which indicated that there were no witnesses to the accident, filled out by the police officer who responded to the accident scene, they had, from the outset, notice of the facts upon which plaintiff's claim is premised ( see, Matter of Cicio v. City of New York, 98 A.D.2d 38, 39-40). Thus, the motion court properly deemed plaintiff's late notices of claim timely served nunc pro tunc. Defendants' claim that they were prejudiced by plaintiff's delay is additionally and significantly undermined by the circumstance that the icy condition to which plaintiff attributes her injury was highly transitory and would not have remained for defendants' investigation even if plaintiff's notices had been timely filed, i.e., within 90 days of the accident ( see, Matter of Strauss v. New York City Tr. Auth., 195 A.D.2d 322).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom and Lerner, JJ.


Summaries of

Gamoneda v. New York City Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1999
259 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Gamoneda v. New York City Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:LETICIA GAMONEDA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 46

Citing Cases

Sosa v. City of N.Y.

Here, the record indicates that respondent's police department's accident investigation squad conducted a…

Sosa v. City of N.Y.

Here, the record indicates that respondent's police department's accident investigation squad conducted a…