From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GAMMA DEVELOPMENT v. AM. PIONEER SAV

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 10, 1990
553 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-1645.

November 1, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 10, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Mary E. Lupo, Judge.

Robert A. Eisen and Cheryl R. Eisen of Law Offices of Robert A. Eisen, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Mark Wilensky of Levy Kneen, Boyes, Wiener, Goldstein Kornfeld, West Palm Beach, James E. Alderman of Swann and Haddock, P.A., Fort Pierce, and Robert P. Summers of Kohl Bobko McKey, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.


The final judgment is affirmed. The trial court did not err by concluding that the American mortgage was superior in priority to the Gamma mortgage. Cf. Southern FloridaBanc Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Buscemi, 529 So.2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Additionally, upon a review of the record, we cannot say that it was an abuse of discretion for the court to find that the value of the mortgaged property and the proceeds from its sale were less than the amount that Gamma would have been required to tender if it had exercised its right of redemption. We do not address the now mooted alternative finding by the trial court that Gamma had lost or abandoned its right of redemption.

DOWNEY, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GAMMA DEVELOPMENT v. AM. PIONEER SAV

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 10, 1990
553 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

GAMMA DEVELOPMENT v. AM. PIONEER SAV

Case Details

Full title:GAMMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 10, 1990

Citations

553 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)