From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galloway v. Money

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 8, 2003
796 N.E.2d 528 (Ohio 2003)

Opinion

No. 2003-1085.

Submitted September 17, 2003.

Decided October 8, 2003.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-03-16.

James Galloway, pro se.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Stuart A. Cole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} In February 1990, the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant, James Galloway, of three counts of rape and two counts of gross sexual imposition and sentenced him to prison. On appeal, his convictions and sentence were affirmed. State v. Galloway (Nov. 8, 1991), Lucas App. No. L-90-056, 1991 WL 254216.

{¶ 2} According to Galloway, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in January 2000 in the common pleas court, and his petition was subsequently denied.

{¶ 3} In April 2003, Galloway filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeals for Marion County. Galloway claimed that his trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him because of ambiguities in his indictments. Galloway further claimed, among other things, that he was actually innocent of the crimes of which he was convicted.

{¶ 4} In May 2003, the court of appeals sua sponte dismissed Galloway's petition.

{¶ 5} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 6} The court of appeals correctly concluded that Galloway's primary claims were not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Turner v. Ishee, 98 Ohio St.3d 411, 2003-Ohio-1671, 786 N.E.2d 54, ¶ 7 ("habeas corpus is not available to test the validity or sufficiency of an indictment or other charging instrument"); State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 298, 299, 714 N.E.2d 921 ("Habeas corpus will not issue to raise claims of insufficiency of evidence").

{¶ 7} Moreover, res judicata barred Galloway from filing successive habeas corpus petitions when he could have raised the same claims in his previous petition. State ex rel Johnson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr. (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 70, 71, 765 N.E.2d 356.

{¶ 8} Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Galloway v. Money

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 8, 2003
796 N.E.2d 528 (Ohio 2003)
Case details for

Galloway v. Money

Case Details

Full title:Galloway, Appellant v. Money, Warden, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 8, 2003

Citations

796 N.E.2d 528 (Ohio 2003)
796 N.E.2d 528
2003 Ohio 5060

Citing Cases

Williamson v. Williams

Habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy to raise Williamson's claims. See, e.g., O'Bannon v. Haskins…

State v. Williams

In addition, as the court of appeals held, habeas corpus is not available to remedy claims concerning the…