From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galivan v. Lowell Dunn Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 2, 1968
212 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 68-8.

July 2, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Francis X. Knuck, J.

Highsmith Ezzo and James O. Nelson, Miami, for appellants.

Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay Kimbrell and Joseph Womack, Blackwell, Walker Gray and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.


The appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, seek review of an order of the trial court dismissing their amended complaint with prejudice as to the appellees, The Lowell Dunn Company and Mills Engineering Company, Inc. The action in the trial court sounded in negligence, and the cause still pends against another defendant who was the alleged active tort feasor.

The appellees were charged in the amended complaint with having removed a stop sign at an intersection while doing certain construction work, after which an automobile accident occurred between the appellants and the remaining defendant in the trial court.

We find no error in the dismissal of the appellees, The Lowell Dunn Company and Mills Engineering Company, Inc. See: Rosen v. City of Miami, 141 Fla. 664, 193 So. 749; Raven v. Coates, Fla. App. 1961, 125 So.2d 770.

Therefore, the final order here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Galivan v. Lowell Dunn Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 2, 1968
212 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Galivan v. Lowell Dunn Company

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM R. GALIVAN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 2, 1968

Citations

212 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)