From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galindo v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
1:12-cv-01613-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-cv-01613-AWI-SKO (PC)

05-06-2013

JESUS GALINDO, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, Defendants.


ORDER DISREGARDING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


(Docs. 9 and 10)


60-DAY DEADLINE

On May 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for judicial notice and a separate motion seeking an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations filed on March 28, 2013. It is unnecessary for Plaintiff to seek judicial notice, and the Court may only take judicial notice of facts "generally known within the trial court's territorial jurisdiction" or which "can be accurately and readily be determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." Fed. R. Evid. 201(a). Therefore, Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is HEREBY DISREGARDED.

However, good cause having been shown, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his objections within sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Galindo v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
1:12-cv-01613-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Galindo v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:JESUS GALINDO, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-01613-AWI-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)