From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galindo v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 7, 2012
No. 1:10-cv-06195 (D. Or. Mar. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cv-06195

03-07-2012

ALFREDO P. GALINDO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Commission, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the ALJ erred by failing to account for the limitations found by one of plaintiff's physicians. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#24) is adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Galindo v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 7, 2012
No. 1:10-cv-06195 (D. Or. Mar. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Galindo v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALFREDO P. GALINDO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 7, 2012

Citations

No. 1:10-cv-06195 (D. Or. Mar. 7, 2012)