From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galaska v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1991
177 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 15, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.

Present — Callahan, A.P.J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs fail to allege that they did not agree to arbitrate. Rather, plaintiffs seek to avoid the clear and explicit arbitration provisions contained in the policy, issued by defendant, on the ground that the policy was never delivered to them. That argument is devoid of merit because plaintiffs' entire claim is premised on the existence of that policy (see, CPLR 7503 [a]; see also, Bohlen Indus. v. Flint Oil Gas, 106 A.D.2d 909, 910).


Summaries of

Galaska v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1991
177 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Galaska v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WALTER A. GALASKA et al., Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
577 N.Y.S.2d 988

Citing Cases

Schunk v. New York Central Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Such limitations periods are enforceable ( see, Blitman Constr. Corp. v Insurance Co., 66 NY2d 820, 822;…

Ruiz v. State Wide Insulation and Con. Corp.

The declarations page and the accompanying endorsements were made part of the insurance policy and were…