From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaira Bay, Inc. v. Aguilar

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 14, 2004
Case No.: C03-2035 JL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2004)

Opinion

Case No.: C03-2035 JL

January 14, 2004

STEPHEN V. BOMSE, CATHERINE P. ROSEN 2 JONATHAN WESTEN, HELLER EHRMAN WHITE McAuLIFFE LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs


CONSENT JUDGMENT


WHEREAS, the Complaint in this action was filed by Gaira Bay, Inc., Barnegat Music Corporation and Sony/ATV Tunes LLC, ("Plaintiffs") on or about April 17, 2003, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and served on Defendant Alejandro Mario Aguilar ("Aguilar") on or about May 6, 2003; and

WHEREAS, Aguilar and/or Club Mango's, Inc. did at all times relevant to this action own, control, manage, operate or maintain a place of business for amusement and refreshment known as Mango's Sports Bar Nightclub ("Mango's"), located at 39148 State Street, Fremont, California; and

WHEREAS, Mango's is currently owned and operated by Club Mango's, Inc., as a result of which the parties hereby agree that Club Mango's, Inc. shall be, and hereby is, added as a party defendant to this action; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs were, on the dates alleged on Schedule A to the Complaint, the respective owners of valid copyrights in the three songs listed on Schedule A to the Complaint; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants infringed Plaintiffs' copyrighted musical compositions, listed on Schedule A to the Complaint, at Mango's; and WHEREAS, Defendants deny any such infringement; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are all members of ASCAP and have authorized ASCAP to act on their behalf as attorney-in-fact; and

WHEREAS, ASCAP, on behalf of Plaintiffs, and the Defendants have agreed that Plaintiffs' claims and all claims of any other members of ASCAP based on prior alleged unauthorized public performances of their copyrighted musical works at Mango's for all periods up to and including the date of entry of this judgment shall be settled on the bases set forth below;

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. (a) Defendants shall pay to ASCAP, on behalf of Plaintiffs, the sum of $11,500.00 ("the Settlement Amount") in settlement of the claims alleged in the Complaint and in payment of ASCAP license fees for Mango's for all periods through November 30, 2004.

(b) The Settlement Amount set forth in paragraph 1(a) shall be paid in installments on the dates set forth below:

Payment Due Date Total Payment

January 15, 2004 $2,000.00

February 15, 2004 $2,000.00

March 15, 2004 $2,000.00

April 15, 2004 $1,000.00

October 31, 2004 $4,500.00

TOTAL: $11,500.00

2. Defendants shall pay to ASCAP, 2960 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 490, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, Attention Diane Ussery, the amounts set forth in Paragraph 1(b) above. Defendants shall be considered in default if the monthly payments set forth in Paragraph 1(b) above are not received by ASCAP within ten (10) calendar days after a payment due date.

3. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Consent Judgment, ASCAP shall offer, and Club Mango's, Inc. shall accept and execute, a license agreement for Mango's for the term beginning December 1, 2003. The Settlement Amount set forth in Paragraph 1(a) above includes license fees for Mango's of $1,118.00 for the period December 1, 2003 through November 30, 2004.

4. (a) Defendants' October 31, 2004 payment of $4,500.00 shall be reduced by an amount that is equivalent to amounts paid to ASCAP as of that date by new licensees that obtain licenses from ASCAP based on either the advice of Aguilar or a joint request for an ASCAP license by Aguilar and by any such new licensee.

(b) ASCAP shall inform Aguilar by October 31, 2004 of all license fees received from new licensees pursuant to Aguilar's advice, subject to the limitation described below, and/or the joint request of Aguilar and any new licensee. In order for ASCAP to inform Aguilar of the amount received from new licensees based on the advice of Aguilar, any such new licensee must consent to ASCAP's divulging the amount of such license fees to Aguilar,

5. Upon timely receipt of payment of the Settlement Amount submitted in accordance with Paragraph 1 above, Plaintiffs shall file a Satisfaction of Judgment with this Court.

6. In the event that Defendants shall default in making any payments required by this Consent Judgment, Plaintiffs may, upon ten days' written notice from Plaintiffs' counsel to Defendants, execute on this Consent Judgment in the amount of $11,500.00, plus accrued interest calculated at the statutory rate from the date of entry of this Consent Judgment, less any payments made by Defendants in accordance with Paragraph 1 above. This Consent Judgment shall be deemed a non-dischargeable debt in the event Defendants file a petition for bankruptcy.

7. In the event that Defendants shall default in making any payments required by this Consent Judgment, Plaintiffs shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in collecting any balance owed on the judgment at the time of default,

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gaira Bay, Inc. v. Aguilar

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 14, 2004
Case No.: C03-2035 JL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2004)
Case details for

Gaira Bay, Inc. v. Aguilar

Case Details

Full title:GAIRA BAY, INC., BARNEGAT MUSIC CORP. AND SONY/ATV TUNES LLC, Plaintiffs…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2004

Citations

Case No.: C03-2035 JL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2004)