From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gagne v. Vaccaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2012
39 A.3d 1118 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-14

J. William GAGNE, Jr. v. Enrico VACCARO.

Peter A. Ventre, Hartford, in support of the petition. Eugene A. Skowronski, Ansonia, in opposition.


Peter A. Ventre, Hartford, in support of the petition. Eugene A. Skowronski, Ansonia, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 431, 35 A.3d 380, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 51–183c required the trial court to recuse itself from presiding over the hearing on the plaintiffs motion for attorney's fees?”

PALMER and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Gagne v. Vaccaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2012
39 A.3d 1118 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Gagne v. Vaccaro

Case Details

Full title:J. William GAGNE, Jr. v. Enrico VACCARO.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

39 A.3d 1118 (Conn. 2012)
304 Conn. 907

Citing Cases

Gagne v. Vaccaro

The Appellate Court determined that this conclusion was dispositive of the appeal and remanded the case to…

Hammond v. Hammond

See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 133 Conn.App. 431, 439, 35 A.3d 380, cert. granted, 304 Conn. 907, 39 A.3d 1118 (2012)…