From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaddy v. Lee

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Dec 6, 2022
3:20-cv-00925 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00925

12-06-2022

ADAYSE L. GADDY, Plaintiff, v. GOVERNOR BILL LEE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

No objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 59) recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice.

The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and the record in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's analysis and conclusion. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 59) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gaddy v. Lee

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Dec 6, 2022
3:20-cv-00925 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Gaddy v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:ADAYSE L. GADDY, Plaintiff, v. GOVERNOR BILL LEE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00925 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 6, 2022)