From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaddy v. Fla. Parole Probation Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 26, 1982
416 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AH-293.

June 18, 1982. Rehearing Denied July 26, 1982.

Appeal from the Parole and Probation Commission, Ray E. Howard, Commissioner.

James Lisk Gaddy, pro se.

Catherine L. Dickson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.


We affirm the Commission's determination of Gaddy's presumptive parole release date (PPRD). The record reveals that Gaddy was advised of the aggravating factors used in determining his PPRD and he signed the examiner's report.

There was no error in aggravating Gaddy's PPRD for multiple separate offenses even if he was given concurrent sentences. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5); Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5), note 7.

Also, there was no error in classifying Gaddy's offense as a "Category VI, Greatest (Most Serious — I)," because "If an offense can be classified under more than one category, the most serious applicable category is to be used." Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.05, note 3.

SHIVERS, J., and CAWTHON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Gaddy v. Fla. Parole Probation Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 26, 1982
416 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Gaddy v. Fla. Parole Probation Comm

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LISK GADDY, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 26, 1982

Citations

416 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Variance v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

There is no constitutional impediment to the commission's consideration of a prisoner's multiple offenses…