From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gabran v. O Y Liberty Plaza Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1991
174 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motion is granted, and the actions shall be tried jointly.

The plaintiffs allege in their bills of particulars and affidavits that certain injuries to the cervical spine suffered by the plaintiff Nahed Gabran in a slip and fall accident on September 30, 1987, were exacerbated in an automobile accident she suffered on October 24, 1988. In the interests of judicial economy, in order to avoid inconsistent verdicts, and in the absence of demonstrable prejudice, the motion to jointly try these two negligence actions should have been granted (see, Dolce v Jones, 145 A.D.2d 594; Heck v Walbaum's Supermarkets, 134 A.D.2d 568; Boyman v Bryant, 133 A.D.2d 802). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gabran v. O Y Liberty Plaza Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1991
174 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Gabran v. O Y Liberty Plaza Company

Case Details

Full title:NAHED GABRAN et al., Appellants, v. O Y LIBERTY PLAZA COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
571 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Tuckett v. Wavecrest Mgmt. Team Ltd.

Where common questions of law or fact exist, a motion to consolidate or for a joint trial pursuant to CPLR…

Tuckett v. Wavecrest Mgmt. Team Ltd.

Where common questions of law or fact exist, a motion to consolidate or for a joint trial pursuant to CPLR…