From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fust v. Wanek

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Oct 3, 2016
NO. 35,449 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 3, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 35,449

10-03-2016

NORMAN PETER FUST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CATHERINE WANEK, Respondent-Appellee.

Almanza Abrams, P.A. Jared Abrams Las Cruces, NM for Appellant Camunez Law Firm, P.C. Rosanne Camunez Las Cruces, NM for Appellee


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DONA ANA COUNTY
Mary W. Rosner, District Judge Almanza Abrams, P.A.
Jared Abrams
Las Cruces, NM for Appellant Camunez Law Firm, P.C.
Rosanne Camunez
Las Cruces, NM for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge /s/ _________
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge


Summaries of

Fust v. Wanek

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Oct 3, 2016
NO. 35,449 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Fust v. Wanek

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN PETER FUST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CATHERINE WANEK…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

NO. 35,449 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 3, 2016)