From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fusco v. Raneri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 24, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiff was driving on 69th Street in Brooklyn, behind a bus operated by the appellant. As the two vehicles approached the intersection of 13th Avenue and 69th Street, the bus, which had a green traffic light, began to execute a wide right turn. The defendant Louis Raneri, who was stopped on 13th Avenue at the red light, pulled forward into the intersection to accommodate the bus and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. After a trial, a jury found that each defendant was partially at fault for the happening of the accident.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court did not err in refusing to charge the jury that a New York City traffic regulation prohibits buses from backing up. There was no evidence that the bus driver should have or could have backed up to avoid forcing the defendant Louis Raneri into the intersection.

We find no merit to the appellant's remaining contention. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fusco v. Raneri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Fusco v. Raneri

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FUSCO, Respondent, v. LOUIS RANERI et al., Respondents, NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
645 N.Y.S.2d 507