From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furst v. Marroquin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 21, 1993
622 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Summary

In Furst Churchill and State Equity had sold a mortgage but did not deliver the original promissory note or mortgage to the mortgagee.

Summary of this case from Costello v. Adams

Opinion

No. 92-2765.

August 3, 1993. Rehearing Denied September 21, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Philip Bloom, Judge.

Taylor, Brion, Buker Greene and Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellants.

Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schuster Russell, P.A., and John H. Pelzer and Cary A. Lubetsky, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Marroquin, Umana and Londono.

Wayne J. Sobien Associates, P.A., Oviedo, for appellee Home Sav. of America.

Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


Affirmed. Baader v. Walker, 153 So.2d 51 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 156 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1963); § 673.303, Fla. Stat. (1989).


Summaries of

Furst v. Marroquin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 21, 1993
622 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

In Furst Churchill and State Equity had sold a mortgage but did not deliver the original promissory note or mortgage to the mortgagee.

Summary of this case from Costello v. Adams
Case details for

Furst v. Marroquin

Case Details

Full title:MORTON FURST AND DEBORAH FURST, APPELLANTS, v. ARTURO MARROQUIN AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 21, 1993

Citations

622 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Costello v. Adams

Bernstein. Finally, we note that at this stage of the proceedings appellee's reliance on Furst v. Marroquin,…