From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Funes v. Electrolux Home Prods.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 27, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:15-0845 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:15-0845

06-27-2016

RAFAELA FUNES v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS


Judge Campbell/Knowles

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The undersigned previously entered an Order on April 15, 2016 (Docket No. 24), requiring Plaintiff to file with the Court a written explanation showing cause for her failure to serve Defendant within 90 days after the filing of the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Order required Plaintiff to file such explanation within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of the Order, and it also stated in pertinent part, "If Plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice."

As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff did submit a "Notice of Filing Benefit Review Report" on April 28, 2016, which appears to be a copy of a document issued by the State of Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation. Docket No. 27. That document does not address the service of the complaint and summons.

Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14) days after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have fourteen (14) days after service of any objections filed to this Report in which to file any response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 111 (1986); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.

/s/_________

E. CLIFTON KNOWLES

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Funes v. Electrolux Home Prods.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 27, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:15-0845 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Funes v. Electrolux Home Prods.

Case Details

Full title:RAFAELA FUNES v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 27, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:15-0845 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 27, 2016)