From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Funcia v. N.Y. Stock Exch. NYSE Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 2, 2020
19-CV-10718 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2020)

Opinion

19-CV-10718 (LLS)

03-02-2020

JESUS MANUEL FUNCIA a/k/a MANUEL J. FUNCIA, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE NYSE GROUP; JEROME LEVY; DAVID CAREY; JEANNE MILLER; SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC); HARVEY GOLDSCHMIT; SUSAN WYDERKA; AL PENSA; JIM CLARKSON; ABN-AMNRO; ING; FURMAN SELZ; MICHAEL PYTRCKI; DAVID DUFFY, Defendants.


BAR ORDER UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 :

Plaintiff filed this action pro se. On January 15, 2020, the Court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted because his claims are barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion, noted that Plaintiff had filed two other cases in this Court against the same Defendants, and ordered Plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why he should not be barred from filing further actions in forma pauperis (IFP) in this Court without prior permission.

Plaintiff filed a declaration on February 19, 2020, stating:

The SEC has a direcliton [sic] of duty that amounts to constitutional violation of 14 Amendment. NO Equal Protection. Judge Levy had a blatant "Conflict of Interest." I plead with Hon. Judge Stanton to take full control in the prosecution of this case at all & any level.
Justice must be served.
The FOIA should be used (19-02372-FOIA)
for any evidentiary [illegible] (19-00070-FOIA).
(ECF No. 5 at 1.) Plaintiff also attaches to his declaration copies of an email exchange with the S.D.N.Y. Pro Se Legal Clinic. (Id. at 4-6.)

Page numbers refer to those generated by the Court's electronic filing system. --------

That material against imposing the bar order is insufficient to overcome the effect of two Judge's decisions dismissing his claims.

CONCLUSION

The Court bars Plaintiff from filing future civil actions IFP in this Court, regarding his relationship with the SEC, without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Plaintiff must attach a copy of his proposed complaint and a copy of this order to any motion seeking leave to file. The motion must be filed with the Pro Se Intake Unit of this Court. If Plaintiff violates this order and files such an action without filing a motion for leave to file, the Court will dismiss the action for failure to comply with this order.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 2, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

Louis L. Stanton

U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Funcia v. N.Y. Stock Exch. NYSE Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 2, 2020
19-CV-10718 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Funcia v. N.Y. Stock Exch. NYSE Grp.

Case Details

Full title:JESUS MANUEL FUNCIA a/k/a MANUEL J. FUNCIA, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STOCK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 2, 2020

Citations

19-CV-10718 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2020)