From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Funches v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 6, 2005
No. 03:05-CV-00174-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2005)

Opinion

No. 03:05-CV-00174-LRH (VPC).

December 6, 2005


ORDER


Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (Doc. #16) entered on September 29, 2005, denying Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. #2), filed on March 25, 2005. Plaintiff filed Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recomendation (sic) (Doc. #17) on October 11, 2005, Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #18) on October 21, 2005, and Plaintiff filed his Reply to Defendants Response to Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #19) on October 31, 2005, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Defendant, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#16) entered on September 29, 2005, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#16) entered on September 29, 2005, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. #2) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Funches v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 6, 2005
No. 03:05-CV-00174-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2005)
Case details for

Funches v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:MARRITTE FUNCHES, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 6, 2005

Citations

No. 03:05-CV-00174-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2005)