Opinion
December, 1892.
A.I. Sire, for plaintiff (respondent).
William H. Arnoux, for defendant (appellant).
No sufficient ground is assigned in support of this motion. Reference to the opinions (19 N.Y.S. 660) disclosed that no novel question of law was involved in the appeal, which is our only justification for adding to the seriously lengthened calendar of the court of last resort. Hence, the leave asked for, if granted, could result only in vexations, delay and expense to the respondent. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
DALY, Ch. J., and PRYOR, J., concur.
Motion denied.