From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fulton v. Fulton

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 25, 2015
468 S.W.3d 906 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 77660

08-25-2015

Elaina Marie Fulton, Appellant v. Jeffrey Jay Fulton, Respondent

Robert Smith, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant Gary Steinman, Gladstone, MO, Counsel for Respondent David Sexton, Gladstone, MO, Co–Counsel for Respondent


Robert Smith, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant

Gary Steinman, Gladstone, MO, Counsel for Respondent

David Sexton, Gladstone, MO, Co–Counsel for Respondent

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, P.J., Joseph M. Ellis, and James Edward Welsh, JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Elaina Fulton appeals the circuit court's Judgment for Interest on Supersedeas Bond and Termination of Modifiable Maintenance, claiming that the circuit court erred in failing to apply the correct statutory rate of interest to the property equalization payments owed by Jeffrey Fulton in their dissolution of marriage case. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fulton v. Fulton

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 25, 2015
468 S.W.3d 906 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Fulton v. Fulton

Case Details

Full title:Elaina Marie Fulton, Appellant v. Jeffrey Jay Fulton, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 25, 2015

Citations

468 S.W.3d 906 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)