From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuller v. Carolina Best Title Loans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Jun 25, 2019
C.A. No. 6:18-2865-HMH-KFM (D.S.C. Jun. 25, 2019)

Opinion

C.A. No. 6:18-2865-HMH-KFM

06-25-2019

Darell Andre Fuller, Appellant, v. Carolina Best Title Loans and TitleMax Title Secured Loans, Appellees.


OPINION & ORDER

This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kevin F. McDonald, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006).

The Appellant filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The court must "only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).

After a thorough review of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge McDonald's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore

ORDERED that the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina's September 20, 2018 order denying the Appellant's motions to avoid liens and the October 11, 2018 order denying the Appellant's motion to reconsider are affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Henry M. Herlong, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge Greenville, South Carolina
June 25, 2019

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The Appellant is hereby notified that he has the right to appeal this order within thirty (30) days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3, 4 and 6 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Fuller v. Carolina Best Title Loans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Jun 25, 2019
C.A. No. 6:18-2865-HMH-KFM (D.S.C. Jun. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Fuller v. Carolina Best Title Loans

Case Details

Full title:Darell Andre Fuller, Appellant, v. Carolina Best Title Loans and TitleMax…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2019

Citations

C.A. No. 6:18-2865-HMH-KFM (D.S.C. Jun. 25, 2019)