From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuller v. Chatham

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jul 20, 1921
53 Cal.App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)

Opinion

Civ. No. 3812.

July 20, 1921.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co., 180 Cal. 675.

A. A. Moore, Stanley Moore and L. R. Weinmann for Appellants.

Adams Adams for Respondent.


This is an appeal by the sureties on a contractor's bond from a judgment in favor of a materialman.

The decision of the superior court was based on the case of General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co., 180 Cal. 675, [ 182 P. 444].

[1] After a very careful examination of the record and briefs filed in the instant case, we believe it is not distinguishable from the General Electric Company case, supra; but, on the contrary, we are of the opinion that the aforementioned case is directly in point under the facts of the present case. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 15, 1921.

All the Justices concurred.


Summaries of

Fuller v. Chatham

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jul 20, 1921
53 Cal.App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
Case details for

Fuller v. Chatham

Case Details

Full title:W. P. FULLER CO. (a Corporation), Respondent, v. WILLIAM CHATHAM et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Jul 20, 1921

Citations

53 Cal.App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
200 P. 293

Citing Cases

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham

Affirmed. The facts are the same as in W. P. Fuller Co. v. Chatham et al., 53 Cal.App. 800 [ 200 P. 293]. A.…