From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuechsel v. Bellesheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 4, 1888
19 N.E. 285 (N.Y. 1888)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1888

Decided December 4, 1888

Flamen B. Candler for motion.

Henry H. Davis opposed.


The following is the mem. of decision:

"It does not appear that notice of this motion was served on the infants or their guardian or attorney, and for that reason, as to them, it is denied. As to the adult appellant the motion is granted, without costs."

All concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Fuechsel v. Bellesheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 4, 1888
19 N.E. 285 (N.Y. 1888)
Case details for

Fuechsel v. Bellesheim

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE E. FUECHSEL, Respondent, v . ANNA BELLESHEIM et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 4, 1888

Citations

19 N.E. 285 (N.Y. 1888)
111 N.Y. 682