Ft. Trade Fin., Corp. v. Roadway, Inc.

Full title: FT. TRADE FINANCIAL, CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ROADWAY, INC., Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

337 So. 3d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-0638

01-05-2022

FT. TRADE FINANCIAL, CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ROADWAY, INC., Appellee.

Wilson Law Firm South Florida, P.A., and Paul E. Wilson (Plantation), for appellant. Benitez & Associates, and Leo Benitez and Lizette Benitez, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Wilson Law Firm South Florida, P.A., and Paul E. Wilson (Plantation), for appellant.

Benitez & Associates, and Leo Benitez and Lizette Benitez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Umana v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 282 So. 3d 933, 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("[W]hile it is true that the absence of a transcript is not necessarily fatal to review of a trial court's decision at a summary judgment hearing, it is not the nature of the hearing, but rather than the nature of the alleged error, which dictates the adequacy of the record on appeal[.]") (internal citations omitted); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.").