Ft. Trade Fin., Corp. v. Roadway, Inc.

Full title: Ft. Trade Financial, Corporation, Appellant, v. Roadway, Inc., Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

No. 3D21-0638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-0638

01-05-2022

Ft. Trade Financial, Corporation, Appellant, v. Roadway, Inc., Appellee.

Wilson Law Firm South Florida, P.A., and Paul E. Wilson (Plantation), for appellant. Benitez & Associates, and Leo Benitez and Lizette Benitez, for appellee.

PER CURIAM

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County Lower Tribunal No. 19-7942-CC, Maria D. Ortiz, Judge.

Wilson Law Firm South Florida, P.A., and Paul E. Wilson (Plantation), for appellant.

Benitez & Associates, and Leo Benitez and Lizette Benitez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. See Umana v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 282 So.3d 933, 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("[W]hile it is true that the absence of a transcript is not necessarily fatal to review of a trial court's decision at a summary judgment hearing, it is not the nature of the hearing, but rather than the nature of the alleged error, which dictates the adequacy of the record on appeal[.]") (internal citations omitted); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.").